Donald Trump ‘bitten by woman after being forced to perform oral act’, Epstein file claims

The US president has been named in the latest Epstein documents release, with one unproven file claiming an unidentified woman bit him during incident 35 years ago

US President Donald Trump has been mentioned in the Jeffrey Epstein files following the US justice department’s release of three million pages of documents. The massive disclosure encompasses roughly 2,000 videos and 180,000 images from the records.

They are coming after thousands of additional pages had previously been made available to the public. Being referenced in the files does not indicate any criminal behaviour.

One document alleges that an unnamed woman was forced to perform oral sex on the president 35 years ago. In the explosive revelation, it is claimed that a young woman bit Trump during the sexual encounter.

Multiple individuals have already appeared in photographs within the files, including former president Bill Clinton.

Pictures of the women featured in the documents have been obscured, except for those showing convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is presently serving a 20-year prison sentence for her part in procuring underage women for the paedophile.

Neither Trump nor Clinton have been formally charged with any misconduct, reports the Express. Previous document releases suggest that Trump travelled repeatedly aboard Epstein’s private aircraft.

This newest batch of documents increases the mentions of the president within the highly contentious papers. The current allegations mirror those from a 2016 civil case filed anonymously.

According to Fox News, it accused Trump and Epstein of sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl at a gathering organised by the paedophile financier in 1994. It was reported that the lawsuit described similar acts in which Trump allegedly tied the plaintiff to a bed, raped her and then threatened her family if she spoke out. Epstein was alleged to have also raped the plaintiff.

In 2016 the case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, and no charges ever brought. Trump’s representatives at the time stated the claims “categorically untrue”.

Many notable people have been named or have in other ways featured in the files, but their presence does not mean that they are accused of wrongdoing, or of knowing about Epstien’s crimes. Epstein was well-connected and prosecutors in the case collected as many files as they could to carry out their investigation, which means that those who knew him, but played no role in his crimes, or did not even know about them, can be mentioned in the files.

The US Justice Department has labelled other sections mentioning Trump in the files as “untrue and sensationalist” and noted that they had been submitted anonymously to the FBI in 2020, without evidence. Officials in the US have been keen to make clear that no documents have suggested Trump was under investigation for any wrongdoing.

While the president has claimed that some of the files had been “faked” or doctored by his rivals. The Department’s disclosures have come under fire for heavy censoring, absent documents, and vanishing proof – including an alleged incident where a Trump photograph ‘disappeared’ from the website moments after being posted.

It has branded other portions referencing Trump in the documents as “untrue and sensationalist” and noted they had been submitted anonymously to the FBI in 2020, without evidence. American officials have been eager to clarify that no papers have indicated Trump was being probed for any misconduct. He himself has insisted that some of the documents had been “faked” or altered by his opponents.

For the latest breaking news and stories from across the globe from the Daily Star, sign up for our newsletters.